Both Thomas
Harris and Richard Dyer discuss Marilyn Monroe in terms of her playmate image,
but what interested me in this week’s readings was Dyer’s discussion of Monroe
in relation to psychoanalysis and vaginal imagery. Dyer argues that in the
1950s, “there were specific ideas of what sexuality meant and it was held to
matter a very great deal; and because Marilyn Monroe acted out those specific
ideas, and because they were felt to
matter so much, she was charismatic, a centre of attraction who seemed to
embody what was taken to be a central feature of human existence at the time
(17).” Dyer’s argument is two-fold in that he examines Monroe’s image using two
differing discourses, one being that of the playmate, and the other is female
sexuality in itself, questioning the existence of the vaginal orgasm. I found
the first part of Dyer’s argument much easier to follow, as it helped explain
Monroe’s massive popularity and appeal.
As the theme
of this course thus far has been cultural contradictions, Dyer’s initial
argument seems to point towards Monroe managing contradictions, but as he moves
forward an argument can be made that Monroe exposes cultural contradictions in
her representation of female sexuality. Although Dyer writes, “Monroe conforms
to, and is part of the construction of, what constitutes desirability in women,”
his argument moves past what makes a woman desirable to what women themselves
desire (40). Part of my confusion, lies in Dyer’s use uses of psychoanalytic
theory to discuss female sexuality and the notion of the vaginal orgasm. This is
where his chapter deviated for me. As I tried to follow Dyer’s logic, I am left
with more questions than answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment