“North by Northwest calls into question whether masculinity can
ever be assumed to be a coherent and singular, not to say authentic, condition
in culture.”
- Steven Cohan
I watched North by Northwest for the first time in
class last week and I really liked it, but I liked it even better after reading
Steven Cohan’s “The Spy in the Gray Flannel Suit”. I was fascinated by how much
about masculinity Cohan was able to unpack from the Hitchcock film. Reading
this article, I realized how, when watching the movie, I missed a lot of what
Cohan writes about masculinity in Cary Grant’s character; a lot of it just
passed by unnoticed. This made me question if we are trained not to question or
observe masculinity closely, which maybe we are because, as Cohan’s analysis
points out, star personae and their representations show the contradictions of
masculinity and how fragile it actually is.
We are so used to stories in
which the female is defined by marriage and domestic life that I found it
refreshing how Cohan shows that Roger Thornhill, Carry Grant’s character in North by Northwest, ultimately finds his
masculinity in marriage. Cohan brings up how in the 1950s the norm was that a
mature and responsible man was a married one and that a single man was
considered irresponsible, immature and weak. Masculinity is very much connected
to strength, virility, thus, in this case, masculinity is defined by marriage.
Linked to marriage, masculinity was also defined by the idea of togetherness
and the domestic ideology of men and women, breadwinner and homemaker, living
together. I found it interesting how these terms have very much been used to
characterize women – women have to get
married, women have to pursue a domestic life, etc. –, but were
here, in this text and in the movie, characterizing a man. There appear to be
several contradictions in masculinity, as it is often constructed with
superiority towards femininity, but is actually rooted in similar ideologies to
those of the female gender.
When we watched Now, Voyager, we talked about how
Charlotte’s femininity was only cured after she looked beautiful and had a man.
There appear to be some similarity to that in Cary Grant’s character in North by Northwest. As Cohan argues, Eve
is a sort of cure for Roger’s masculinity: “the film discloses that Eve is
neither helper nor vixen but the double agent, then she represents both the
cause of masculinity’s crisis and its means of cure” (11). It is also pointed
out in this same text that Roger is almost always well dressed, almost always “clean
and freshly pressed regardless of circumstances” (17). Thus, both Charlotte and
Roger reach some sort of gender cure in between good looks and a love interest
of the opposite sex.
How different can masculinity
and femininity be, then? Among all the contradictions surrounding the star
image, gender appears to involve many, which are well represented by Cary
Grant’s persona as pointed out by Cohan. For a gender that has a historical
“brand” encompassing strength, virility, power, solidity, hardness, it is
contradictory to see how masculinity is actually not that different from its
“opposite” and is more fragile and unstable that we, superficially, perceive it
to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment